Sony SVE1712P1EB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemSony SVE1712P1EB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120313
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateJul 22 '23 at 19:40
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 114
55% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 162
20% 156 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
Sony(104D 90AC) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.4
4% 4.97 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4
Splatting 4.4
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 283 279 285 287 282 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 361
Write 281
Mixed 220
SusWrite 282
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 28.7
101% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 233
195% 284 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1333 Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19N 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 44 60 17.3" 1600 900 CMN1728
Typical SVE1712P1EB Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony SVE1712P1EB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback