Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '23 at 13:31
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 195
62% 115 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 490
47% 387 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.7.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.4% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 82.8
Parallax 50.1
46% 63.1 fps
MRender 41.6
Gravity 49.5
Splatting 48
38% 46.4 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 803 947 952 977 981 968 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 949
Write 999
Mixed 918
SusWrite 938
215% 951 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 41.8
134% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 743
DQ Mixed 605
458% 604 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 164%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 0P 5R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 50% 18 250 141 144 15.5" 1600 900 NCP004D
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback