Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '23 at 21:49
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 216
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 562
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 577
36% 577 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670
PwrHis(1787 7600) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 5
5% 5.93 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 6.8
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate SSD 250GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST8S1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 167 277 277 197 282 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 495
Write 452
Mixed 397
SusWrite 238
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 35.6
124% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 216
202% 313 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD4U320038G22-B 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.1" 1920 1080 GSM5788 W2363D
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback