Asrock Z97 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '23 at 17:58
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 621
67% 532 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 370X
Gigabyte(1458 2554) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 35
Reflection 38.2
Parallax 36.7
28% 36.6 fps
MRender 31.9
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 25.4
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 650 120GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT01B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 75 73 88 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 473
Write 121
Mixed 168
SusWrite 86.2
46% 212 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 23
85% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 35.8
DQ Mixed 49.3
50% 85.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55%
Great: 84%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
58GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 317 318 319 247 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 484
Mixed 454
SusWrite 302
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 55.6
184% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 361
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 112%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
233GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 119 119 119 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 134
Write 136
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 118
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
231GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 99 98 99 99 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 55.2
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 98
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 7.2
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 20 120 23.5" 1280 720 AUS242A ASUS VG249Q1A
Typical Z97 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme6 - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $862
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback