Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '23 at 07:45
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 77.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 877
81% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,263
78% 1,263 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Asus(1043 886D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3551 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.6% Good
Lighting 79.5
Reflection 66
Parallax 127
65% 90.8 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 91.6
64% 76.7 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Viperteq VT-SSDUP500-256-M.2-PM 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8TM53.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 209 202 110 118 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 492
Write 214
Mixed 268
SusWrite 160
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 31.6
126% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 132
112% 159 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 128%
INTENSO 240GB
51GB free
Firmware: U0312A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 74 58 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 478
Write 307
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 62.7
47% 217 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 28.9
87% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 0.3
42% 102 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 104%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 198 191 198 196 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 169
Mixed 74
SusWrite 195
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-3G2E1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 33.1
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 31.1
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 17 75 23.8" 2560 1440 ACR06F9 QG241Y
Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback