Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX506HM

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	8.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX506HM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506HM
Memory	16.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230303
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '23 at 19:35
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11800H 56,029 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Memory 68.4 1-Core 158 2-Core 296 92% 174 Pts	4-Core 571 8-Core 936 92% 754 Pts	64-Core 1,317 82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 16F2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.18% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 123 Parallax 10.7 8% 47.8 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 11.1 Splatting 9.6 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.18% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB 10,852 User benchmarks, average bench 225% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,831 Write 1,445 Mixed 1,192 330% 1,489 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 96.1 4K Mixed 47.2 195% 66.2 MB/s	DQ Read 792 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 640 445% 569 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 313%
Nvme KINGSTON SKC3000S1024G 1TB 313 User benchmarks, average bench 396% 618GB free Firmware: EIFK31.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1379 1540 1530 1226 914 761 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 1623 Write 1488 Mixed 1,515 SusWrite 1,225 329% 1,463 MB/s	4K Read 51.3 4K Write 97.4 4K Mixed 68.2 217% 72.3 MB/s	DQ Read 904 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 642 467% 622 MB/s
Poor: 205% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 609%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston KF3200C20S4/16GX 24GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.2% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 20.9 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 17.1 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	144	15.5"	1536 793	CMN1521

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX506HM Builds (Compare 2,794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_FX506HM

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	1,352x
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	1,285x
Core i9-11900HIntelBench 89%, 6,494 samples	153x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	1,257x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	831x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	705x

SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	844x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 225%, 10,852 samples	671x
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBNvmeBench 229%, 5,082 samples	600x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 19,121 samples	1,009x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	620x
8ATF2G64HZ-3G2E2 1x16GBMicronBench 47%, 2,656 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16