Huananzhi X79PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79PLUS  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime52.6 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 15:16
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 177
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 649
60% 500 Pts
64-Core 937
58% 937 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Nvidia(10DE 1E89) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.6% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 129
Parallax 124
91% 122 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 100
Splatting 95.4
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1782 995 846 848 849 846 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,276
Write 1,932
Mixed 1,589
SusWrite 1,028
382% 1,706 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 55.7
179% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 535
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 492
350% 451 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 229%
Great: 346%
Q-720 720GB
671GB free
Firmware: T181207
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 453 452 453 454 233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 447
Write 435
Mixed 375
SusWrite 415
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 31
108% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 258
197% 265 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70EB0- M393B2G70EB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- 64GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 40.4
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000
Typical X79PLUS Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback