Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive375% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory118.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 09:35
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$790
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 51.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
72% 138 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 916
80% 683 Pts
64-Core 3,266
202% 3,266 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 166
Parallax 167
133% 165 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 149
Splatting 124
122% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
355GB free
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1486 1732 1843 1850 1722 1328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 1,899
Mixed 1,020
SusWrite 1,660
369% 1,645 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 61.1
208% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1117
DQ Write 955
DQ Mixed 1,004
761% 1,025 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 292%
Great: 354%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2355 2354 2358 2365 2366 2368 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
375% Outstanding
Read 2,656
Write 2427
Mixed 2,212
SusWrite 2,361
544% 2,414 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 71.8
244% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 1,106
830% 1,112 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 375%
Great: 578%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
441GB free
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 515 296 424 128 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 865
Write 526
Mixed 629
SusWrite 324
131% 586 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 47.3
163% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 463
359% 491 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 127%
Great: 144%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
253GB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 87 90 89 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate ST14000VN0008-2JG101 14TB
509GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 164 166 165 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 2% Great: 104%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$201
8GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 65 71 69 64 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 95.2
Write 115
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 58.2
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2933 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 24.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 25.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 34.1" 1280 720 DELA131 DELL U3419W
Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $829
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback