Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 02:01
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 53.9
2-Core 111
52% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 328
33% 269 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1279 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.5% Below average
Lighting 44.4
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 69.4
36% 57.8 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 54.8
Splatting 44.3
43% 53.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 030fAA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 358 344 369 370 371 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 378
Write 376
Mixed 365
SusWrite 355
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 26.8
94% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 150
116% 154 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 211%
Toshiba HDWT740 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: KQ0K0R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 170 168 170 164 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 142
Write 120
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 165
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
218% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 104%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
2.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 186 180 180 188 185 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 96
Write 95.7
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 182
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Game Drive Xbox 8TB
1TB free, PID aa10
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 98 97 99 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 113
Write 116
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 99.7
135% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
172% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 77%
Seagate Game Drive Hub 8TB
25GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 112 104 89 116 114 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 110
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 109
116% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.5
254% 3.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 24" 1280 720 AOC2460 2460
Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback