Lenovo 82NA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics5.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82NA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '23 at 22:46
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Memory 11
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 75.8
28% 52.8 Pts
4-Core 96.8
8-Core 131
14% 114 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3FB3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.28% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.1 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.8
6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-desire(p) 512G 512GB
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400fAA13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 59 58 38 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 1,021
Write 349
Mixed 107
SusWrite 45.6
82% 381 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 31.3
119% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 60.9
DQ Mixed 88.9
77% 117 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86%
Great: 205%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
868GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 97 96 97 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
23.4% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 9
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 394
10% 394 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 60 14" 1280 720 BOE08F2
Typical 82NA Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82NA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback