System76 Gazelle

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardSystem76 Gazelle  (all builds)
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '23 at 21:16
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 52.9
1-Core 60.9
2-Core 110
44% 74.5 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 245
26% 206 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 867C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.61
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
2.2% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 105%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Clevo(1558 867C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4338
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.51% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 1.6
2% 2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 1.51%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1474 1362 1439 1503 1466 1480 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,428
Write 1,562
Mixed 1,420
SusWrite 1,454
331% 1,466 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 80.1
187% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 512
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 442
322% 423 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 226%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown (9b05) CT32G4SFD832A.C16FE 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 23.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 10.8
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0A0 LG TV
Typical Gazelle Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: System76 Gazelle

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 172% - Outstanding Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback