Asrock N68-GS4 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive2.36% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '23 at 17:34
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 18.2
2-Core 40.9
31% 42 Pts
4-Core 60.8
8-Core 76.8
9% 68.8 Pts
64-Core 85.3
5% 85.3 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.8% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 45.2
Parallax 40.5
35% 43 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 36.1
31% 38 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU120G1 120GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z310
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 26 12 15 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Read 31
Write 37.7
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 16.6
8% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
0% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 32%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
871GB free
Firmware: 2BA3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 113 111 111 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 87.1
Write 72.2
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 111
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 0R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 10% 59 153 1 60 21.5" 1280 720 IVM5627 PL2252MT
Typical N68-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback