bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '23 at 10:49
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6132
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
25% Poor
Memory 8.92
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 83.7
21% 43.3 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 369
36% 294 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 25%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1032 1014 1187 1526 140 194 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 566
Write 596
Mixed 423
118% 529 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 18.5
63% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,250
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 695
549% 787 MB/s
Poor: 299% Great: 592%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 14.7
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 414
10% 414 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 19 15 0 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback