Gigabyte GA-A520M K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A520M K (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221115
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '23 at 02:33
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80 3,830 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Memory 80 1-Core 153 2-Core 294 95% 176 Pts	4-Core 558 8-Core 798 85% 678 Pts	64-Core 1029 64% 1029 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1630 933 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Nvidia(10DE 169C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.8% Poor	Lighting 34.2 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 29.2 28% 31.4 fps	MRender 31.9 Gravity 29.8 Splatting 29.4 25% 30.4 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team TM8FPD512G 512GB 1,141 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: H221124a Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,897 Write 2,481 Mixed 1,492 438% 1,957 MB/s	4K Read 63.7 4K Write 159 4K Mixed 85.5 290% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 1,090 DQ Write 813 DQ Mixed 472 483% 792 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 307%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 32GB-$11 2,386 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 26GB free, PID db8a Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 147 Write 81.6 Mixed 96.9 128% 108 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0 96% 4 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 37%
ST500LM0 30-2E717D 500GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 87GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 25 28 29 32 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 31.8 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 27.5 42% 31 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 99,207 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 30.2 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 26.7 SC Write 41.4 SC Mixed 29.3 93% 32.5 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	72	60	100	23.8"	1280 720	IPS2380 TF-G240

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A520M K Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M K

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $125Bench 86%, 14,368 samples	21x
Ryzen 5 5600AMD $134Bench 93%, 9,841 samples	18x
Ryzen 5 5500AMD $80Bench 86%, 3,830 samples	16x

GPU
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	13x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	13x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	6x

SSD
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	10x
SNV2S500G 500GBKingstonBench 233%, 18,653 samples	5x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	4x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	11x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	5x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $125

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $36
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16