Alienware Aurora R13

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive444% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora R13  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0JJFMD
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '23 at 02:21
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900F-$417
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 202
2-Core 391
115% 223 Pts
4-Core 707
8-Core 1,236
117% 971 Pts
64-Core 2,547
158% 2,547 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 104%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Dell(1028 C890) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.24
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 283
Reflection 256
Parallax 292
231% 277 fps
Gravity 237
Splatting 175
178% 206 fps
Poor: 163% Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PM9A1 Samsung 1024GB
675GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36309229 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3429 3382 3451 2139 1539 1544 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
444% Outstanding
Read 2,846
Write 3,429
Mixed 2,774
SusWrite 2,581
657% 2,908 MB/s
4K Read 81.1
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 111
370% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,420
DQ Write 1,176
DQ Mixed 1,349
996% 1,315 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 444%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M323R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
136% Outstanding
MC Read 54.4
MC Write 54
MC Mixed 50
151% 52.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 25.4
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 126%
This bench: 136%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 46 100 34.8" 1280 720 DELA1E4 Dell AW3423DW
Typical Aurora R13 Builds (Compare 899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback