Asus ROG STRIX B360-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B360-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180614
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 21:41
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 260
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 787
76% 628 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.3% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 47
Parallax 55.7
36% 48.7 fps
MRender 46
Gravity 43
Splatting 32.2
32% 40.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 128 127 125 122 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 456
Mixed 434
SusWrite 152
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 50.8
167% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 128%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
137GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 97 99 100 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 82.1
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 97.8
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
43GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 83 82 84 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48% Average
Read 83.4
Write 57.7
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 83.5
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 48%
Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
30GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 65 64 59 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 170
Write 182
Mixed 93.6
SusWrite 61.3
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
216% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 115%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
19GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 63 66 60 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 156
Write 170
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 59.3
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 110%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
144GB free
Firmware: CT100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 65 64 61 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 66.9
Write 64.8
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 66.6
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16D4/4G KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2666C16D4/4G KHX2666C15D4/4G 16GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 26.5
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 27.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.5" 1280 720 ACI24C7 ASUS VP247
Typical ROG STRIX B360-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B360-F GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback