Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 243%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 321%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics219% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive419% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory113.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 20:41
Run Duration364 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 73.6
1-Core 211
2-Core 417
120% 234 Pts
4-Core 823
8-Core 1,563
142% 1,193 Pts
64-Core 3,764
233% 3,764 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
219% Outstanding
Lighting 327
Reflection 299
Parallax 336
267% 321 fps
MRender 362
Gravity 258
Splatting 189
211% 269 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 219%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
958GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2820 1849 1839 1852 1870 1848 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
419% Outstanding
Read 2,828
Write 3,287
Mixed 3,027
SusWrite 2,013
629% 2,789 MB/s
4K Read 72.6
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 99.7
356% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1767
DQ Write 1,544
DQ Mixed 1671
1,248% 1,661 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 419%
Great: 526%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3295 3290 3297 3294 2240 1486 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
479% Outstanding
Read 2,852
Write 2,983
Mixed 3,037
SusWrite 2,817
660% 2,922 MB/s
4K Read 75.7
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 110
376% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,831
DQ Write 1,622
DQ Mixed 1,741
1,302% 1,731 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 479%
Great: 526%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2662 2658 2647 1509 1529 1503 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
419% Outstanding
Read 2,688
Write 2,434
Mixed 1,941
SusWrite 2,084
514% 2,287 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 102
350% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,801
DQ Write 1,619
DQ Mixed 1,701
1,278% 1707 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 419%
Great: 435%
Amd-raid Array 1 16TB
8TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 390 407 399 401 397 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 367
Write 380
Mixed 159
SusWrite 401
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 1.2
33% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 6.5
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 7.1
6% 8.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 173%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 165 170 166 172 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 134
Write 146
Mixed 115
SusWrite 162
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
345% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3238G324x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 54.1
MC Write 51.6
MC Mixed 52.1
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 47.7
SC Write 59.8
SC Mixed 50.1
150% 52.5 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 147%
Great: 193%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 240 48.7" 1280 720 SAM71AC LS49AG95
Typical ROG CROSSHAIR X670E EXTREME Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR X670E EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback