Gigabyte GA-H310N

Performance Results


Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310N (all builds)
Memory	7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '23 at 16:06
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$129 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 116 2-Core 233 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 541 65% 499 Pts	64-Core 487 30% 487 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% HP(103C 88D4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	130% Outstanding	Lighting 183 Reflection 173 Parallax 166 149% 174 fps	MRender 187 Gravity 135 Splatting 117 116% 147 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 130 200 274 292 266 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 415 Write 43.8 Mixed 144 SusWrite 218 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 55.5 4K Mixed 26.9 95% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 162 145% 225 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 128%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 71GB free Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 703 571 571 520 509 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 1,028 Write 1,061 Mixed 998 SusWrite 632 209% 930 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 40.8 132% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 809 DQ Write 454 DQ Mixed 598 454% 620 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 347%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	81% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 24.2 83% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 23.1 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 17: 0P 2R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
17%	33%	21	204	46	144	23.5"	1920 1080	AOC2401 24G1WG4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310N Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310N

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $129Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	13x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	8x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	8x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	4x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	4x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	3x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	3x
X110 M.2 2260 256GBSandiskBench 74%, 231 samples	3x

RAM
BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GBCrucialBench 79%, 22,335 samples	4x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x16GBUnknownBench 48%, 6,240 samples	4x
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 1x8GBCrucialBench 40%, 2,742 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16