Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PO9-900_RGB  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO9-900_RGB
Memory52.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 15:24
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900X-$590
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 232
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 804
75% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,430
88% 1,430 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Sapphire(174B A503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 206
Parallax 254
172% 224 fps
MRender 270
Gravity 212
Splatting 173
174% 218 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 158%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 944 887 347 457 229 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 4.2
Write 149
Mixed 325
SusWrite 523
58% 250 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.3
12% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 421%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB
539GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 964 895 1269 1174 1316 1284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 7
Mixed 4
SusWrite 1,150
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 2.1
30% 6.73 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 421%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
180GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1810 1713 1913 1678 1811 1770 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 300
Write 7.2
Mixed 198
SusWrite 1,783
131% 572 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 3.5
24% 6.87 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 128%
Great: 372%
Amd-raid ST16000NM001G-2K 16TB
3TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 109 123 126 127 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 2.7
Write 61.8
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 122
35% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 146%
Seagate ST20000NM007D-3D 20TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 220 260 260 269 261 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 64GB
2666, 2133, 2666, 2133, 2133, 2666, 2133, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 45.6
MC Mixed 27.3
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 9.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 27" 2560 1440 ENC3069 CS2731
Typical Predator PO9-900_RGB Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,188
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback