Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220428
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '23 at 15:23
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	EST-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$134 9,841 User benchmarks, average bench 93% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 92.6 1-Core 168 2-Core 335 107% 199 Pts	4-Core 604 8-Core 871 92% 738 Pts	64-Core 1132 70% 1132 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8750) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Lighting 79.6 Reflection 77.5 Parallax 75.2 65% 77.4 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 73.6 Splatting 59.9 53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JAJP600M256C 256GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614B0G SusWrite @10s intervals: 537 440 334 575 523 385 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	157% Outstanding	Read 1,531 Write 933 Mixed 512 SusWrite 466 190% 860 MB/s	4K Read 51.8 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 34.1 157% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 755 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 350 288% 428 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 201%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 89GB free Firmware: S3E00100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 418 335 220 64 68 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 477 Write 367 Mixed 388 SusWrite 255 83% 372 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 28 107% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 117 108% 168 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESCK.M8FE BL16G32C16Z4BL.8FB 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 3600, 3600 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	88.6% Excellent	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 29.4 89% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 28 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 29.9 80% 28.2 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	60	75	33.1"	1280 720	AOC3279 Q3279WG5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $89Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	602x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	154x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	117x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	117x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	113x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	104x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	50x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	113x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	78x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $356

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16