Asrock Z690 PG Velocita

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 438%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 511%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics388% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z690 PG Velocita  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221117
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 13:47
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 207
2-Core 413
122% 235 Pts
4-Core 821
8-Core 1,534
140% 1,177 Pts
64-Core 2,782
172% 2,782 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
388% Outstanding
Lighting 617
Reflection 588
Parallax 786
503% 664 fps
MRender 540
Gravity 576
Splatting 311
373% 476 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 388%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO LPX 2TB
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,738
Write 4,877
Mixed 3,100
806% 3,572 MB/s
4K Read 72.6
4K Write 353
4K Mixed 133
467% 186 MB/s
DQ Read 2,130
DQ Write 1,848
DQ Mixed 2,116
1,551% 2,031 MB/s
Poor: 253% Great: 602%
Transcend TS2TSSD230S 2TB
527GB free
Firmware: S0401A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 470 469 469 404 429 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 470
Mixed 415
SusWrite 452
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 52.3
183% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 109
146% 266 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 120%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C4016G-B 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
188% Outstanding
MC Read 79.9
MC Write 71.3
MC Mixed 71.3
212% 74.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 48
SC Mixed 31.8
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 188%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 2560 1440 MSI3DA2 MAG321CURV
Typical Z690 PG Velocita Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 229%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690 PG Velocita

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback