MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 03:51
Run Duration628 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 875
82% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,232
76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Lighting 89.1
Reflection 135
Parallax 169
73% 131 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 90.3
Splatting 158
121% 148 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 719 726 726 749 753 752 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,372
Write 920
Mixed 704
SusWrite 738
208% 934 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 39.6
128% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 548
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 274
219% 320 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 155%
Great: 373%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
846GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1169 893 893 889 884 891 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 2,065
Mixed 1,889
SusWrite 936
387% 1,723 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 54
169% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,028
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 247
264% 466 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 216%
Great: 486%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 151 149 151 149 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 140
Write 146
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 149
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
364GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 102 105 98 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 117
Write 131
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 102
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 101 99 103 106 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 137
Write 138
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 102
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
379GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 124 129 125 128 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 109
Write 98.2
Mixed 62
SusWrite 130
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUH728080ALE601 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: A4GL0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 166 172 170 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 172
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 170
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1
232% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 107 111 108 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 97.3
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 110
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ04ABD200 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: JT001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 102 99 102 104 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 148
Write 125
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 101
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
237% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 80%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
714GB free
Firmware: JA0OA700
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 73 70 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 96.2
Write 58.2
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 69.9
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 57%
Toshiba MQ04ABD200R 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: JT001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 147
Write 126
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 102
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
242% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 79%
Toshiba MQ04ABD200 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: JT001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 103 106 105 107 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 143
Write 125
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 103
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
238% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 80%
Toshiba HDWL120 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: JT000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 101 105 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 147
Write 130
Mixed 56
SusWrite 103
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
236% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 80%
Toshiba MQ04ABD200 2TB
532GB free
Firmware: JT000U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 83 77 84 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 167
Write 41.7
Mixed 37
SusWrite 78
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.5
300% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 80%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
818GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 93 93 97 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 133
Write 142
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 94.1
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJAONS04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 140 143 144 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 160
Write 127
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 143
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
398GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 156 155 160 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 116
Write 124
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 156
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 158 159 156 158 153 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 157
Write 163
Mixed 89
SusWrite 157
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
415GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 129 127 125 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 136
Write 128
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 126
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 154 150 149 149 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 156
Write 154
Mixed 92.4
SusWrite 150
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 92%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 133 131 130 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 154
Write 157
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 133
180% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK04 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 23 28 30 33 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 135
Write 141
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 25.1
120% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31%
Great: 64%
JMicron Generic DISK01 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 116
Write 126
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 0
100% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK02 4TB
621GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 0.1
97% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 68%
JMicron Generic DISK03 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 133 131 130 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 132
Write 149
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 133
169% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 35
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 28.2
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 31.5
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 36.1" 1280 720 INS4303 NS43DF710NA21
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $473
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback