Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 17 '23 at 01:08
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 139
2-Core 255
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 595
64% 511 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.9% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 128
Parallax 175
85% 136 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 118
Splatting 86.8
84% 105 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GCSU 512GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 457
Write 412
Mixed 404
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 32.6
100% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 307
237% 324 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 107%
Seagate BUP SL 5TB
207GB free
Firmware: 0109
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 44.9
Write 67.7
Mixed 60.6
13% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.4
3% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 13%
WD WD40EURX 4TB-$113
87GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.3
Write 57.2
Mixed 63.4
53% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 94%
Seagate ST3300622AS 300GB-$130
54GB free
Firmware: 3.AAH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 19
Mixed 35.9
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 37%
Maxtor STM3320620AS 320GB
92GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 74.3
Write 57.3
Mixed 47.6
45% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 44%
Seagate Expansion SW 8TB
113GB free
Firmware: 1801
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 147
Write 164
Mixed 113
105% 141 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.8
378% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 94%
Touro Mobile 3TB
325GB free, PID 1025
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 99.5
140% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 12.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 10.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 21 75 32" 1280 720 HPN3378 OMEN by HP 32
Typical GA-Z270-Gaming K3 Builds (Compare 2,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3 - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $867
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback