Asus P5P43TD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5P43TD  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '17 at 20:20
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 40.7
2-Core 85.7
46% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 172
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
MSI(1462 8A96) 2GB
CLim: 1072 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.19% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 12
8% 10.6 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 13.1
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.19%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.4% Below average
Read 206
Write 101
Mixed 119
31% 142 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 13.3
70% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 13.5
21% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
177GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 95.6
Mixed 33.2
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.28
86% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5P43TD Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5P43TD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback