Dell Latitude 3410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemDell Latitude 3410  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0N3VPD
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220329
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 16 '23 at 22:30
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10310U
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 36.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 120
48% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 217
25% 196 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Dell(1028 09EC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 6
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.27 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.6
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM034-2GH17A 500GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 44 82 88 83 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 67.1
Write 123
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 70
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.4
120% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471A1K43DB1-CWE 80AD HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 1R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 56% 16 43 2 60 14" 1296 759 LGD05F3
Typical Latitude 3410 Builds (Compare 1,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude 3410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback