Dell Latitude E6330

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E6330  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0P1XMK
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121008
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 16 '23 at 17:25
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 118
53% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 151
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 0533) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 74 135 63 89 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55% Above average
Read 361
Write 294
Mixed 310
SusWrite 93.4
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 20.4
90% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 14.1
54% 122 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6330 Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback