Asrock AB350M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350M  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '23 at 15:17
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 233
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 800
73% 613 Pts
64-Core 1,044
65% 1,044 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 977 1648 1097 105 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 2,026
Write 1,686
Mixed 1,236
SusWrite 684
314% 1,408 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 63.2
220% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 1072
DQ Mixed 859
656% 873 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 230%
Great: 320%
Kingston SA400S37/240G 240GB
88GB free
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 426 436 415 99 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 494
Write 446
Mixed 382
SusWrite 310
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 15.3
139% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 18.6
68% 147 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
379GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 111 108 108 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 162
Write 132
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 108
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.1
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 35.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M Builds (Compare 381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback