Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160624
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 16 '23 at 09:57
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 252
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 423
54% 407 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 69.2
58% 71.8 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 67.8
56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,651
Write 882
Mixed 572
226% 1,035 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 49.9
195% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,066
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 367
341% 552 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 243%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
1TB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 457 472 479 478 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 432
Mixed 433
SusWrite 444
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 51.5
178% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
985GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 160
Write 138
Mixed 34.1
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 108%
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB
239GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 262
Write 80.2
Mixed 91.2
150% 144 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 2.8
737% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 23.8
DQ Mixed 3.4
983% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 129%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
785GB free, PID 8016
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 115 114 115 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
49% Average
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 114
124% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2666C15-8GVR F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-2666C15-8GVR F4-2400C15-8GVR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback