Exper ULTRABOOK-Q5V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemExper ULTRABOOK-Q5V  (all builds)
MotherboardEXPER ULTRABOOK-Q5V
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '23 at 00:56
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 100
48% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 146
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Quanta(152D 0989) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 7
Parallax 2.7
3% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37/240G 240GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0201A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 258 376 367 151 196 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 403
Write 337
Mixed 345
SusWrite 274
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 12.5
72% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 98.3
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 27.4
62% 123 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 106 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 70.1
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 105
61% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2S2G64CB88G4N-CG 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ULTRABOOK-Q5V Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Exper ULTRABOOK-Q5V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback