Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '23 at 16:35
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 858
87% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,068
66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.7.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.2% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 58.9
Parallax 75.1
45% 62.9 fps
MRender 58.9
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 43
43% 54.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY 480GB SATA SSD 480GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 105 12 13 70 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 476
Write 352
Mixed 384
SusWrite 58.3
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 0.6
65% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 92.9
DQ Write 13.7
DQ Mixed 0.7
14% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 103%
Tph00500500gb 8 500GB
363GB free
Firmware: JC2OR39G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 107 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 101
Write 109
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 106
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 35.5
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 29
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback