To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '23 at 08:53
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 172
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 597
57% 469 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gigabyte(1458 351C) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 17.1
15% 20.1 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 17.9
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 477
Write 344
Mixed 331
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 28.9
119% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 172
156% 234 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
500GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 181 184 186 187 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 159
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 185
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272PZ- 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 26.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback