HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86D4
Memory2.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 14 '23 at 17:41
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 68.6
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 177
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 410
46% 360 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 86D4) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.40.54.01
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 17.9
11% 23.4 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 12.9
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11%
Great: 13%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
HP(103C 86D4) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 38
Parallax 37.4
28% 36.4 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 25.5
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 763
Write 347
Mixed 680
132% 597 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 47.3
138% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 159
181% 324 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 147%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
3TB free, PID a306
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 131
Write 116
Mixed 21.2
103% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 62%
SDHC Card 8GB
6GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.7
Write 14.7
Mixed 6
16% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8ME-8 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx Builds (Compare 2,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback