Lenovo 80M7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80M7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G41-35
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160810
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 14 '23 at 04:45
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Memory 50.6
1-Core 32.5
2-Core 64.3
32% 49.1 Pts
4-Core 79.7
8-Core 112
12% 95.8 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 3806) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.53 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RX7 2.5 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 317 158 7.9 12 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 345
Write 242
Mixed 220
SusWrite 135
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 7.1
62% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 13.6
45% 97.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
34GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 98 98 101 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80M7 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80M7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback