| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Z840 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2129 |
| Memory | 48.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20211207 |
| Uptime | 4.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 14 '23 at 02:26 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
|
59.1%
Above average
|
68% 126 Pts
|
55% 468 Pts
|
200% 3,237 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
EVGA(3842 3885) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
184%
Outstanding
|
215% 258 fps
|
185% 235 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 PRO Series 1TB
587GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 433 431 439 436 423 MB/s
|
95% 423 MB/s
|
138% 46.1 MB/s
|
257% 343 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
60GB free
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 204 190 193 191 191 MB/s
|
73.2%
Very good
|
65% 293 MB/s
|
98% 36.4 MB/s
|
191% 278 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CRC 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.2%
Below average
|
33% 11.4 GB/s
|
24% 8.5 GB/s
|
33% 122 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,957 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z840 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 132x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 117x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples | 101x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 150x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 103x |
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 94x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $95 |