Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$160 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Memory 86.6 1-Core 122 2-Core 241 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 612 70% 546 Pts	64-Core 641 40% 641 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 16,200 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Clevo(1558 55A1) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3064 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Lighting 35.4 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 37.6 29% 37.1 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 25.4 25% 30.7 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D128 128GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: CT20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,271 Write 563 Mixed 569 175% 801 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 95.9 4K Mixed 22.8 125% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 85.2 127% 234 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 135%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 915GB free Firmware: JU000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 138 140 136 117 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	75% Very good	Read 134 Write 118 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 126 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.6 228% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 8AAD PJ8TFK1GM8 16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	69.5% Good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 20.1 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 21 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i5-9400Intel $160Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	7x

GPU
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	5x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples	2x

SSD
CL1-8D128 128GBNvmeBench 104%, 82 samples	3x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $105Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	3x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 8AAD PJ8TFK1GM8 16GBSamsungBench 71%, 18 samples	5x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	2x

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $160