HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84DA
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 15:00
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 206
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 426
52% 398 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 84DA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6345
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 6.3
5% 14.2 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.7
7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv128g TOSHIBA 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 721
Write 108
Mixed 187
73% 339 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 28.3
107% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 110
91% 133 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 135%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
186GB free
Firmware: RXM3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 121
Write 137
Mixed 68.1
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G HP26D4S9S8ME-8 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.9% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 19.8
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 20
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback