Wacom Cintiq Companion 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWacom Cintiq Companion 2  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL CRESCENTBAY
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 14:30
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5557U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 150
57% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 190
27% 196 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)
Device(1B0A 019B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 9.8
5% 6.17 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 0.2
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Storejet Transcend 1TB
825GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 89 69 34 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 3.7
Write 12.5
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 65
16% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 65%
SAMSUNG UFD 16GB
10GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 15 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Read 16
Write 0.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 13.6
10% 8.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown A3L-1GS64F3-12E2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Cintiq Companion 2 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Wacom Cintiq Companion 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback