Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO Q7010  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3813-A1
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220121
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 09:29
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400T
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 191
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 609
58% 479 Pts
64-Core 753
47% 753 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1259) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.2
5% 7.43 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 601 579 565 576 573 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2,222
Write 1,920
Mixed 1,400
SusWrite 614
343% 1,539 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 60
194% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 414
DQ Mixed 637
454% 587 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 212%
Great: 296%
Freecom 2TB
954GB free
Firmware: 1402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 100 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 100
Write 78.5
Mixed 59
SusWrite 99.8
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 70%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
954GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 38 39 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 37.8
Write 39.8
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 38.7
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
61.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.7
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 19.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO Q7010 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback