Asrock H310M-G/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H310M-G/M.2  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 13 '23 at 00:19
Run Duration554 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 684
71% 573 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 53
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 48.7
43% 52.7 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 45
38% 46 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASE8TNVME256 256GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8TM14.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 110 65 82 98 74 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 97.5
Write 313
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 88.4
29% 127 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 12.5
46% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 97.2
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 231
142% 153 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 115%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
88GB free
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 86 87 85 85 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 124
Write 96.8
Mixed 128
SusWrite 84.5
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 17.5
52% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 105
80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 61%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-00ZAT0 500GB
329GB free, PID 00db
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 31 28 29 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.54% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 26.6
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 31
32% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
15% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 19%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
10GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 24 30 29 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.65% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 23.6
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 26
32% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
23% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.65%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU88A-26N1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.2
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M-G/M.2 Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock H310M-G/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $557
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback