Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-5005U 50,603 User benchmarks, average bench 38% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Memory 27.2 1-Core 54.9 2-Core 91.7 32% 57.9 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 132 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 070C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	3.78% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 5.5 3% 3.93 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 4 Splatting 7 5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.78% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-128V2S-11 2.5 7mm 128GB 1,579 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: FC7110C SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 140 164 160 140 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 344 Write 176 Mixed 208 SusWrite 148 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 20.6 4K Mixed 15.4 50% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 140 112% 158 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6P1 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 272 15% 272 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	285x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 3,725 samples	13x

SSD
Z400s 2.5 7MM 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 973 samples	33x
LCH-128V2S-11 2.5 7mm 128GBLiteonBench 67%, 1,579 samples	24x
CM871 2.5 7mm 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 1,004 samples	14x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	34x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	20x
KNWMX1-ETB 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 3,520 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16