Asrock H110M-DVS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DVS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160519
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 19:42
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 163
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 329
44% 326 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
ASRock(1849 1912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.47 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PSSD256GBQSU2-E7 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0105A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 59 73 58 50 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 345
Write 196
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 63.7
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 0.4
51% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 17.6
DQ Mixed 21.1
28% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
337GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 112 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 113
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.1% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 17
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback