Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 960GM/U3S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 14 '17 at 03:09
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 108
50% 79 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 323
32% 259 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 31
Parallax 37.8
32% 36.1 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 37
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 240GB-$200
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.6% Above average
Read 256
Write 216
Mixed 214
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 15.4
85% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 66.9
DQ Mixed 14.5
20% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 95%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
184GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
44% Average
Read 74.9
Write 78
Mixed 23.5
43% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.21
78% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JM1333KLN-4G JM1600KLH-4G 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback