HP ZBook 15 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 15 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 842A
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 17:30
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 75
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 170
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 334
38% 297 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 842A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9416
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 7.7
6% 14.8 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 11.5
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.33%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ZD512 512GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HT3105A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 66 138 254 115 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 447
Write 427
Mixed 359
SusWrite 142
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 12.4
82% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 16.4
70% 152 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A1K43CB1-CTD - [0xCE06] AD4SHX8GT5WB-FQGA - [0xCE06] AD4SHX8GT5WB-FQGA 32GB
2667, 2667, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 15.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 G5 Builds (Compare 1,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback