Asrock X300M-STX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X300M-STX  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 02:28
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 245
77% 143 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 589
60% 485 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 17
Parallax 31.3
18% 23.6 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 27.1
Splatting 15.6
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk A400 SD9PN9U-256G-1002 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A3550000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 211 210 213 214 213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 904
Write 403
Mixed 263
SusWrite 221
98% 448 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 51.4
173% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 514
DQ Mixed 342
323% 507 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 130%
Great: 135%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
53GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 64 98 129 115 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 178
Write 100
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 109
122% 102 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 7.8
661% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 11.4
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 9.5
777% 11 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 27
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X300M-STX Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock X300M-STX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback