AMD AOPW-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	AMD AOPW-PLUS (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD AOPW-PLUS
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180317
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '23 at 20:06
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 6378 31 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 57.9 1-Core 45.9 2-Core 92.1 40% 65.3 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 303 28% 231 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.2% Very good	Lighting 91.1 Reflection 103 Parallax 94.4 74% 96.2 fps	MRender 92.7 Gravity 93.5 Splatting 95 77% 93.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 35 44 44 43 39 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.2% Below average	Read 188 Write 174 Mixed 159 SusWrite 44.3 32% 141 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 23.8 85% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.9 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 33.2 27% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 85%
Toshiba MK1665GSX H 160GB 630 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 86GB free Firmware: GJ001Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 66 67 66 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 77.1 Write 69.5 Mixed 45.4 SusWrite 66.1 47% 64.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 4GB 202 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AOPW-PLUS Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: AMD AOPW-PLUS

CPU
Opteron 6276AMDBench 44%, 50 samples	5x
Opteron 6376AMDBench 49%, 24 samples	3x
Opteron 6128 HEAMDBench 39%, 21 samples	3x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	2x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	2x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	2x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	2x
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 960GBAMDBench 101%, 182 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1K70CH0-YH9 2x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 50 samples	2x
36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 2x16GBMicronBench 48%, 43 samples	2x
M393B2K70DMB-YH9 2x16GBSamsungBench 30%, 18 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $79

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16