Lenovo 20369

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20369  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4A2
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 11 '23 at 07:34
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4030U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 84.5
47% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 118
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 M230
Legend(17AA 380C) 2GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 6.7
4% 5.6 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 153 54 71 62 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 348
Write 199
Mixed 206
SusWrite 93.6
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 13
49% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 35.9
44% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20369 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback