Asrockrack ROMED8-2T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrockrack ROMED8-2T  (all builds)
Memory242.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '23 at 03:43
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core
P0, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 78.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 920
83% 702 Pts
64-Core 5,145
318% 5,145 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A5500
Nvidia(10DE 165A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.14
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
153% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 312
Parallax 214
161% 241 fps
MRender 290
Gravity 208
Splatting 174
177% 224 fps
Poor: 138%
This bench: 153%
Great: 187%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHPP41-2000GM 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51060A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1463 1181 883 909 822 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,748
Write 1,246
Mixed 210
SusWrite 1,107
239% 1,078 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 53
174% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 655
488% 653 MB/s
Poor: 301%
This bench: 221%
Great: 641%
Avago MR9361-8i 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 823 843 845 848 834 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
HPT DISK 0_0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4143 4191 4210 4163 4188 4198 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA4GR7AJR8N-XN 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
363% Outstanding
MC Read 158
MC Write 144
MC Mixed 152
433% 152 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 41
108% 37.8 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 363%
Great: 369%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROMED8-2T Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrockrack ROMED8-2T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback