Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C850D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	0.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '23 at 03:24
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1200 APU 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Memory 86.5 1-Core 5.8 2-Core 11 31% 34.4 Pts	4-Core 11.4 8-Core 11.7 2% 11.5 Pts	64-Core 3.7 0% 3.7 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 7,882 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FDE6) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.8% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.8% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$25 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900J13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 124 73 91 95 130 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.2% Very poor	Read 64.1 Write 70.4 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 110 16% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 5.2 16% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB1600D3S1ELD/2GE Adata AD73I1A0873EU 3GB 1600, 1333 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.87% Terrible	MC Read 0.5 MC Write 1 MC Mixed 1.8 3% 1.1 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 0.5 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.33 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	1x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	1x
M471B5773CHS-CK0 1x2GBSamsungBench 21%, 746 samples	1x

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $25

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16