MSI MS-17E2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics66.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GP75 Leopard 9SD
MotherboardMSI MS-17E2  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 21:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 137
60% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 537
49% 413 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1272) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.2% Good
Lighting 80.7
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 79.1
66% 83.3 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 80.2
Splatting 73.6
67% 83.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 72%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1272) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 8.8
5% 8.43 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 10.7
8% 8.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ128G8NY 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 32 32 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 94%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
88GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 254 122 82 82 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 497
Write 471
Mixed 389
SusWrite 146
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 39.5
132% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 350
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 21.9
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 21.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E2 Builds (Compare 1,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback