Acer Aspire A315-57G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-57G  (all builds)
MotherboardIL Happy_IL
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 13:19
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 48.8
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 157
55% 99.3 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 224
24% 192 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Acer(1025 1429) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 7
5% 9.4 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 8.6
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KLEVV CRAS C710 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1064 1203 1329 642 58 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,225
Write 1,189
Mixed 802
SusWrite 735
222% 988 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 36.8
124% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 342
248% 320 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 146%
Great: 185%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
651GB free
Firmware: JU002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 106 107 102 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 128
Write 117
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 105
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
206% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1KA-4 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 13.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 10.2
28% 10 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-57G Builds (Compare 1,350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-57G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback